This was the most important information of Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, yet it had escaped us.
The attack on Israel was not carried out by Hamas jihadists, but by four united armed groups.
This is the first time in fifty years that the Palestinians of Gaza have united.
Like it or not, the long years of Western indifference to the fate of the Palestinians are ending.
From now on, we will have to start applying international law.
Contrary to what I wrote last week based on dispatches from Western and Arab news agencies filtered by Israeli military censorship, Israel’s attack on October 7, 2023 (operation “Al-Aqsa Flood) “) was not perpetrated by Hamas alone.
Its triggering was decided by a unitary operation chamber of the entire Palestinian Resistance.
Hamas, which is by far the main component, provided the bulk of the troops, but three other groups participated:
Islamic Jihad (Sunni and Khomeinist),
the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (Marxist)
and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command (PFLP-CG).
The Western press reported on the barbaric crimes committed by some of the attackers, but not on the respect of others.
Once verified, the accusations of rape and decapitation of babies  constitute war propaganda.
This one-eyed and lying journalism should no longer surprise us.
This clarification modifies the interpretation of the event.
This is no longer a jihadist operation by the Muslim Brotherhood, but an attack by all Palestinians in Gaza.
Only West Bank Fatah, which stands apart from the aforementioned groups and whose president, Mahmoud Abbas, is seriously ill, did not participate.
The aim of this operation was not to “kill Jews”, even if some Hamas jihadists did so (the Israelis count 2,700 dead in total), but to take prisoners, civilians and soldiers, to exchange them. with Arab detainees in Israeli high security prisons .
These are not necessarily combatants, but also civilians.
The prisoners were taken away without being able to change clothes in a reminder of how the Israeli army treated Egyptian prisoners at the end of the Six-Day War.
Let us remember that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict does not oppose two States (that of Israel still has no borders and that of Palestine is still not recognized), but two populations.
This is a special situation: the Palestinians are not represented by a state and the Israelis have additional responsibilities as the occupying power.
These events come as, on May 15, 2023, the Gulf Cooperation Council, the Group of 77, the League of Arab States, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and China called for the suspension of Israel from the United Nations as that Tel Aviv will not respect its own commitments 
1° DID OPERATION “AL-AQSA FLOOD” SURPRISE ISRAEL?
Contrary to what Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition government claimed, the “Al-Aqsa Flood” did not surprise Israel.
This attack had been planned since the clashes of May 2021.
According to CNN, Hamas trained its fighters for this operation for a year and a half  .
He built six training camps in Gaza and made promotional films there.
Videos of these workouts were released weeks before the attack. [ 5 ]
In March 2023, Hamas sent a strong delegation to Russia.
On this occasion, he warned Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov that his patience was running out and his anger was “on the march”.
In 2023, Iran hosted talks between the region’s various pro-independence forces, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad and Hamas.
They were held in Beirut (Lebanon) under the presidency of General Ismaïl Qaani, commander of the al-Quds brigades of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards.
Their aim was to reconcile these actors who had fought a ferocious war in Gaza, then in Syria.
These meetings were made public in May 2023.
On this occasion the Lebanese press discussed the preparation of the unitary operation which was carried out on October 7.
Iran is therefore responsible for reconciling the Palestinian factions.
On September 30, the Egyptian Minister of Intelligence, Kamel Abbas, telephoned the Israeli Prime Minister to warn him against a major Hamas operation against Israel .
Egypt, which is fighting the Muslim Brotherhood, was worried that Israel would allow it to expand further.
On October 5, the CIA warned the Mossad of a major operation by the United Palestinian Resistance.
The United States was worried about its scale.
However, according to the New York Times , the CIA reports (September 28 and October 5), still classified, did not mention the use of new combat techniques by the Palestinian Resistance.
Israeli intelligence services then held a meeting to assess the threat.
The Shin Bet (counterespionage) and Amman (military intelligence) participated.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his office therefore lied to their citizens by claiming to have been surprised by Hamas.
2° WHY DID ISRAEL ALLOW ITS OWN PEOPLE TO BE KILLED?
Several hypotheses are possible. Here are four:
Settlers residing illegally in the West Bank are omnipresent in the Israeli coalition government.
They were deaf and blind to what was happening in Gaza.
Benjamin Netanyahu, reconnecting with the ideology of his father Benzion Netanyahu and his mentor, the Ukrainian Vladimir Jabotinsky, intended to put an end to the Palestinian presence both in Gaza and in the West Bank.
It was he who described geographic Palestine as “A land without a people, for a people without a land”.
Benjamin Netanyahu, reviving an old project, wanted to create a pretext to justify a war against Iran and extend Israel’s influence in the Middle East.
The American followers of German fascist Leo Strauss, continuing what they are already doing in Ukraine, wanted to create a pretext to justify a broader war against Russia.
These four hypotheses are neither mutually exclusive nor exhaustive.
3° THE PARALLEL OF SEPTEMBER 11
Israeli leaders have drawn a parallel between the official version of the Hamas attack and the official version of the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States.
For them, it is a question of emphasizing the barbarity of the adversary, the surprise of the camp of Good and of justifying the wars which will follow.
This parallel is nourished by the fact that Hamas claims to be the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, while Osama Bin Laden was trained by Mohammad Qutb, the blood brother of the Brotherhood thinker, Sayyid Qutb.
This parallel does not hold: it is impossible that the September 11 attacks were perpetrated by al-Qaeda.
The US authorities have never been able to respond to my objections  to their version.
In addition, new elements have emerged since these events contradicting the administration of President George W. Bush.
Today, 54% of Americans do not believe the version of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry.
However, while it is still unclear precisely who organized the September 11 attacks, we have identified a group that is involved, the Project for a New American Century.
However, one of its main members, Elliott Abrams, is the organizer of the regime change that Benjamin Netanyahu carried out in Israel and which his opposition described as a “coup d’état” .
However, this man has a serious criminal past (he is notably involved in the genocide of the Mayans organized by the Israeli terrorist Yitzhak Shamir and the Guatemalan general Efraín Ríos Montt .
He was convicted in the United States for his lies  and for its role in the Iran-Contras affair), we can reasonably wonder about its possible role in Israel’s passivity in the face of the preparation of the Hamas attack.
Last July, President Joe Biden appointed this controversial Republican to the bipartisan United States Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy, that is to say, to the supervision of US propaganda around the world.
4° WHO ARMED HAMAS?
Such a sophisticated operation requires resources and information that only a state can have.
The weapons he used were from the United States, the Soviet Union and North Korea.
They circulate in Lebanon and Palestine.
Three hypotheses were formulated:
• The hypothesis of Iranian responsibility must be rejected because of the agreement concluded between Hassan el-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, and Rouhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Moreover, Iran has already vehemently denied any responsibility to the United Nations.
However, this is the theory defended by Elliott Abrams .
Iran is not responsible for the “Al-Aqsa Flood”, but for the reconciliation of Palestinian factions.
• The hypothesis of Russian responsibility is not based on any evidence.
At most, we can note that the conflict in Palestine will absorb Western resources and therefore reduce their pressure against Russia in Ukraine.
Likewise, we can anticipate an increase in hydrocarbon prices, favorable to Moscow.
However, Russia does not have the means to initiate a new front as it fights in Ukraine. In addition, Moscow has continued to fight militias from the Muslim Brotherhood since the creation of the Russian Federation.
However, this is the theory that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky argued before the 31 NATO Defense Ministers in Brussels on October 11 .
The Israeli Minister of Defense, Yoav Galant, spoke by video during this meeting, to the same effect .
• The hypothesis of Turkish responsibility, on the other hand, still holds.
In addition to the fact that President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan organized the last Hamas congress in Istanbul, the main leaders of Hamas now reside in Türkiye, while those of the Muslim Brotherhood as an international body are divided between the United Kingdom. United, Qatar and Türkiye.
However, knowing that the CIA was following the preparation of the Hamas operation, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken telephoned his Turkish counterpart and former head of the secret service, Hakan Fidan, on the night of October 6 to 7 , that is to say at the time when Hamas launched its attack and even before the Israeli army woke up.
Finally, during the summit of NATO defense ministers, Secretary Loyd Austin revealed that the United States had asked Turkey to intervene to free the US hostages. However, he did not specify whether this decision was made before or after the dispatch of the USS Gerald Ford naval group .
5° WHAT DOES INTERNATIONAL LAW SAY ABOUT THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN DIFFERENCE?
According to the United Nations, Palestinians have the right to a sovereign state within the 1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital.
This formula implies that:
• The State of Palestine has the right to have its own army (which Israel relentlessly opposes);
• All post-1967 Jewish settlements and East Jerusalem must be returned to the State of Palestine.
• Every Palestinian, or right-holder, will have the right to return to Israel and settle in their home (right of return). Israel will have to compensate those whose property was recycled or destroyed.
According to the United Nations, Israelis have the right to a sovereign state within the 1967 borders with West Jerusalem as its capital.
This formula implies that:
• Israel has the right to have its own army (which it already has)
• All post-1967 Jewish settlements and East Jerusalem must be returned to the State of Palestine.
It is not impossible that Israelis will continue to live there, but it will be as foreigners.
• Israel must grant the right of residence to each Palestinian, or beneficiary, expelled in 1948, who requests it. Israel must return their property or compensate them (right of return).
Initially, these two states (Palestine and Israel) were to be federated within a binational supranational state where each citizen would have an equal voice.
This is clearly impossible at the moment.
We can envisage an international peace force coming to intervene between the two States of Palestine and Israel.
Again this seems difficult. On the one hand because no one will want to be part of it and on the other hand because this is not what the United Nations originally planned.
These envisaged peacekeeping observers, but not a military interposition force. Finally, we can consider demilitarizing the two states and giving them guarantees of non-aggression by their neighbors.
Everyone understands that international law imposes considerable losses of territory and property for Israel, whereas it only involves the abandonment of claims for Palestine.
But it is the price of justice and peace.
6° WHAT IS ISRAEL’S REACTION?
Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition, which includes Jewish supremacists comparable to the Muslim supremacists of Hamas, changed the basic laws of Israel, a state without a Constitution, in August.
In the opinion of observers, particularly the American press, the government carried out a “coup d’état” by suppressing the independence of the judiciary. Massive demonstrations have shaken Israel for several months.
Faced with the attack it is undergoing, Israel can only survive by agreeing to unify its ruling class.
Former Prime Minister Yair Lapid demanded that Jewish supremacist ministers resign so that he could participate in a national unity government.
Itamar Ben-Gvir (Minister of Internal Security) and Bezalel Smotrich (Minister of Finance) have supported, since they were in government, three anti-Arab pogroms, notably that of Huwarrah  .
However, former Defense Minister General Benny Ganz did not set the same condition. Ultimately, the current Prime Minister decided to include both of them in his government, without dismissing the Jewish supremacists.
But he created a war council, from which Jewish supremacists are excluded.
At that moment, military censorship came into play. It was so strong that the Minister of Information, Distel Atbaryan, resigned in the middle of the war.
It is not possible to know the exact composition of the war council, whose deliberations were very stormy.
We just know that the Minister of Defense, General Yoav Gallant, is not at all on the same wavelength as his predecessor, General Benny Ganz.
To the point that the Prime Minister called for help the former chief of staff, General Gadi Eisenkot, a supporter of massive bombings of civilians, so that he could participate in the council’s deliberations as an observer.
Under no circumstances should Israelis and the rest of the world know how each other reacts to Benjamin Netanyahu’s passivity in the preparation of Operation “Al-Aqsa Flood” and in the early hours of its implementation. .
Likewise, no one knows what the war council decided.
President Isaac Herzog himself was kept out of the deliberations.
It seems that the debates discussed the expulsion to Egypt or the massacre of the two million inhabitants of Gaza.
This is why the US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, urgently went to Tel Aviv to call for calm.
7° HOW CAN THINGS EVOLVE?
International law grants Israel the right to defend itself against the attack it is suffering.
This is what he did for five days while chasing the attackers who had entered his territory.
Subsequently, Israel began the siege of Gaza, while the Israeli army bombarded Gaza City (but not the southern Gaza Strip).
This operation once again violates international law.
If we can accept that Israel has a right to follow up on Palestinian fighters in Gaza, the siege of the Gaza Strip and the bombing of civilian buildings are war crimes.
At a press conference, it emerged that Israel’s President, Isaac Herzog, does not know what his army is planning.
Referring to the position of the Arab League since the Six-Day War, Egypt closed its border with Gaza.
The League intends to support Palestinian demands and therefore refuses any transfer of population and any naturalization.
Furthermore, Cairo does not intend to take responsibility for 2 million immigrants and especially not for Hamas, whose parent company, the Muslim Brotherhood, is banned in Egypt.
The Israeli army stands ready to reoccupy the Gaza Strip. It is massing all around.
The occupation of Gaza would constitute a violation of international law, while a counter-insurgency war would, in itself, be a war crime.
The United States has shipped weapons and ammunition to Israel.
They deployed a naval group off the coast of Gaza (the aircraft carrier USS Gerald Ford , the guided-missile cruiser USS Normandy and the four guided-missile destroyers USS Thomas Hudner, USS Ramage, USS Carney and USS Roosevelt ), then a second naval group (the aircraft carrier USS Eisenhower , the guided-missile cruiser USS Philippine Sea , and the three guided-missile destroyers USS Laboon, USS Mason, and USS Gravely ).
However, they called on Israel to exercise restraint.
It seems impossible that Israel could carry out Vladimir Jabotinsky’s project and forcefully empty the Gaza Strip of its two million inhabitants, without international intervention, starting with that of Hezbollah.
A withdrawal of the army is more likely.