The “BRICS” states reaffirm their commitment to Syria’s sovereignty

Were Putting The Band Back Together Were Getting Back Together GIF ...

Moscow, SANA-The states of the BRICS groups reaffirmed on Tuesday their firm commitment to the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Syria.

The final statement of the 12th summit of the “BRICS” states, held through video conference and posted on the Kremlin website said “We declare once again our firm commitment to Syria’s sovereignty, independence, unity and territorial integrity, pointing out that the crisis in Syria can’t be solved through military means ”.

According to Sputnik Agency, the BRICS countries also reiterated their international obligations to combat terrorism with all its forms, stressing  the importance of unity in combating terrorist organizations operating in Syria .

On the Palestinian issue, the BRICS states called for exerting new efforts  for a just and comprehensive settlement for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict .

“No longer viable” implies that the two-state solution has been viable and then became nonviable. Such an argument often presents Israeli settlements as the reason for the change. I disagree with the assertion from two seemingly contradictory arguments:
1) A state’s viability can take many forms and sizes, while borders and territory may be changed and agreed upon; hence there is no “point of no return” after which the two-state solution is no longer viable.
2) To begin with, the two-state solution is dependent on the two sides being willing and able to agree to, deliver, uphold, and survive it. For more than two decades, the required political will in Israel and with the Palestinians has been insufficient or contrary, while both sides doubt that the two-state solution is attainable at all. For the foreseeable future, Hamas as a significant counterforce will impede such an option, while both it and the Palestinian Authority lack the will, ability, and support to lead a united, stable Palestinian state as a reliable partner for peace.

In conclusion, the two-state solution is currently unattainable, if it ever was. This does not exclude the option of its viability in general, yet significant and proactive efforts are needed to create conditions for its success in the future.

When the war against Syria began in 2011, the Zionist enemy was still occupying the Golan Heights and the Turkish enemy was still occupying the Sanjak of Alexandretta.

Over the years, the Syrian Arab Army has managed to dismantle the conspiracies led by the United States and other colonial powers, in which the Zionist enemy and the Turkish enemy participated.

According to the new balance of powers in the region, when the war in Syria comes to an end, the Zionist enemy will be forced to withdraw fully from the Golan without alleged peace deals that follow the Camp David, Oslo and Arabah models.

The withdrawal will be without conditions and similar to the Zionist withdrawal from southern Lebanon in 2000.

The Zionist enemy has a crippling fear about entering into a direct war with the Syrian Arab Army, whose military and fighting capabilities have developed greatly and has stunned the Zionist enemy.

The enemy has tried and failed more than once to test the Syrian air defenses. Syria is fully prepared to enter into a war and liberate the occupied Arab territory in the Golan.

Of course, the same new equations apply to the Turkish enemy, which will be forced to withdraw from Syrian territory which it occupies, because the Syrian Arab Army and its allies will not accept anything but the full liberation of Syrian Arab territory, which has been occupied by aggressor nations which are either directly engaged in this war or which have been occupied by terrorist takfiri groups who work as proxies for them.

After that, Turkey will have to withdraw from the Sanjak of Alexandretta which has been historically occupied and which the Syrian state will not allow to remain occupied.

The Syrian Arab Army is ready to enter into a war to liberate it — with God as our witness.

BRICS another Rothschild enterprise?

ROTHSCHILD control BRICS. ROTHSCHILD control the Worlds Banking System.

Iran, Argentina, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Turkey have applied to join BRICS. Founding members are Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa

Jair Bolsonaro, who recently “lost” the election in Brazil, the Selection Committee appointed Lula, wanted “Braxit” from BRICS.

Bolsonara is also a conservative Christian and loves Israel, like all the Evangelicals in America.

Bolsonaro was completing the process, started by previous President Michel Temer, taking Brazil back to the North-West axis controlled by the U.S.

Now we can clearly see why Bolsonaro had to go.

They tried to kill him, but he survived the assassination attempt.

BRICS is a ROTHSCHILD smokescreen. They have sucked the West dry and now want to transfer their wealth to BRICS to create ever bigger profits.

ROTHSCHILD are moving out of the US Dollar, the global reserve currency, into gold and ‘other currencies’.

They are looking to get ahead of the downward trend curve, and cash out before a global collapse, and use gold to pick up the pieces.

In recent decades more and more Chinese economists and budding entrepreneurs have closely studied the Rothschilds.

At the same time, members of the Rothschild family have looked to a rising China for new business opportunities.

China is fascinated with the Rothschilds and Jewish business practices.

Chinese books on Jewish business practices with titles such as ‘How do Jewish People win?’, Jewish Business Bible’, ‘Jewish Businessmen’s Wisdom’, ‘Jewish Business Teachings’, ‘The Legend of Jewish Wealth’, ‘Jewish Family Education’, ‘The Illustrated Jewish Wisdom Book’ can all be found in the business sections of bookstores across China.

With the increasing interest in business education in China, and a rise in sales of self-help literature, the production of business guides to the TALMUD has exploded.

The guides are like the Chinese equivalents of books such as ‘Sun Tzu and the Art of Business’.

Turkey: Another BRIC in the Wall?

BRICS is reviewing the request made by different nations seeking a membership from BRICS.

BRICS was founded by Brazil, Russia, China and India and 2006 and it was in 2010 that South Africa became a part of the BRICS.

The name was then modified from being ‘BRIC’ to “BRICS.’

Besides Turkey, Argentina, Afghanistan, Mexico, Lebanon and Indonesia have shown great interest in being full-time members of the BRICS.

A long list of other nations to have expressed their desires to be a part of the group.

In 2015 BRICS nations represented over 3.1 billion people which makes up about 41% of the global population.

Four out of the 5 BRICS nations are among the 10 most populated nations of the world.